Wednesday, May 12, 2010
The Effects On Masterbatting
this morning has uncovered the box of thunder. Finally the time has come where the government has to give and realize that nobody in their right mind would spend the long run 11% more than its income, whether you're a freelancer, a small company or a government of Spain.
may have been smoother if they had done before, and spread, rather do it now and all at once. However, I personally believe has been done on purpose. Why? It is no secret that Zapatero is a man obsessed with the "social peace." You may have purposely waited until the last moment, until the English debt face began to rise until the European Union has given a warning, until the press talks about Spain is untenable, until we lost our vaunted triple A. .. to do this. Thus, much of the potential opponents of this measure willingly accepted the argument of "no choice but to do it." Wolf ears peek behind the hedge, and scares us the television images that come from Greece. However, if it was made a year ago ... Ay! which had been busy. This a point that I find interesting. So I think that the delay has been clumsy government financially, but socially astute. Personally, I would put before the scissors ... But for my own sake, try to explain a fucking!
Moreover, I can not help throw another related issue: since we are reaching the expected returns and trade union functionary, saying look what that feeds these cuts with officials and that the pay crisis ever. This is wrong! These cuts are not anti-crisis measures. They are to clean up the accounts of the Government of Spain! And of course, it affects their income to the employees of the government of Spain. The Government of Spain is not Spain. It is as absurd to complain of this as an employee of Telefonica complained that the austerity plan your business is primed with the employees of Telefónica. Exactly, sir. Is that you work there.
course than non-officials will be affected. We are all "shareholders" and "clients" of the state. And there we have to: higher taxes, cuts investment, pension freeze, goodbye baby check, and so on. But no officials are not "employees" of the government. We are employees of other companies that can break or say goodbye. Therefore, public employees should assume that, like any other worker, the "enterprise" for which they work can go well or go wrong.
And please do not try to use the hard work and dedication of "express your opposition" as sufficient grounds for any privilege. In the private sector should not be contested to, okay. But you can spend years working on the first thing that comes with low pay and poor contracts, before achieving stability in a post actually chosen by you (if they ever do). Many more years, on average, of what it takes to contested to.
Sunday, May 2, 2010
Frankenstein Sympathy Chart
In Spain, the street is dead. They are there, the street is the only place where we can see them. In recent decades we have granted in Western culture to the death of our most shameful and we have banished fears and away from our existence, taking it out of our homes, removing even our language (not that we attract to the name). Thus we started out, and even death to hide constructing buildings for funerals, or connected with them, replacing the old home funerals. The death happened to be a public element to private, individual and intimate. And this denial of death leads directly to the need for someone to take care of the dead: Life, cremation, obituaries in the newspapers ... but the dead also have political awareness, in Spain the dead are invisible until someone calls a demonstration. It is then when they appear, without exception. In the excellent novel by Jorge Carrion, "Los Muertos", which is done is raise debate, absurd, whether or not we are responsible for the abuse, torture and death of the fictional characters. A week ago they went out into the street, protesting the crimes of the Franco regime following the complaint of Judge Garzon. One wonders if it will when you start the trial for bribery of the judge to get money from Banco Santander for some courses. We'll see if the dead come to show their unconditional support Garzón and this time I leave you alone. The dead did not dispute the legal validity or otherwise of the complaint, took to the streets to express that follow here, and that political thought in this country not the living but they lead. A few years ago when the Socialist government negotiated a truce with the terrorist group ETA, the dead terrorist out into the street, we saw huge demonstrations with black and white photos with their families in front of the demonstration. Like a kind of emotional blackmail it were, the dead live reminded that they should not seek a peaceful solution. And nobody complained that the dead themselves did not go into the streets when other governments of different political negotiation also searched. Or when the Church took to the streets carrying pictures of destroyed fetuses to criticize the change in abortion law. In Spain, the policy is dead. La dirigen, la controlan. Uno podría creer que son los vivos los que utilizan a sus muertos como argumento político a falta de ideas, pero es al revés. Hemos negado a la muerte, pero ellos han regresado de una forma pacífica, se asocian y ejercen el derecho a manifestarse. La calle es suya. Y su voto cuenta, claro. Algunos han conseguido hasta un escaño en el Senado.
Carlos C.
Friday, April 30, 2010
What Is The Best Outlaw Tire
Thursday, April 15, 2010
What Do You Write In A Baby's Baptism Card?
Garzón and the Law
several days I've been biting my nails every time I open The Country in the morning because the matter Garzón. Special attention to the absurd column today Rosa Montero. We all know the facts: the Supreme Court after a unanimous decision (unanimous I stress) of the Board of Admissions, has been charged for the crime of prevarication, that is, to have knowingly given serious negligence or inexcusable ignorance, a unjust resolution in relation to their research on missing Franco. Moreover, it is sued by two other issues, one on the Gürtel to use recordings of conversations between lawyers and their clients.
I can understand that there are opinions, not only the character but for defendant on the merits, the crimes of the Franco regime. What I can not understand is that public opinion with such recklessness. And among them highlight the two major unions, the other day did a ceremony at the Complutense while unemployment is galloping at home in this country. It bothers me to see members of the Government and the opposition say so very much of judicial decisions as if they were commentators. I see a terrible act of irresponsibility, we'll see if he is guilty or not, let alone the judiciary of this country, so politicized and blocked because of the same critics.
I find despicable attack the argument of those who submitted the complaint, as a far-right party. Could it be that they are not subject to the law? What harassment is a unanimous decision, both progressive and conservative judges? And why can not think that just Garzón was wrong?
Because that's my opinion and is based on the following argument: Justice and Law are not the same. A judge must respect Law, strictly follow the established process and with maximum guarantees. Garzón initiated a process I knew that I was competent and that no charges alive.
Everything else is intentionally mixing form and substance, what is moral and what is desirable, if Garzon plays well with peers or not, if we have done everything possible to victims of Franco, the definition of Universal Justice ...
The Law is the Law Fair or unfair. For everyone. By
Carloh (aka C.)