What Do You Write In A Baby's Baptism Card?

MINDSET Garzón and political Disgusting Act

Garzón and the Law

several days I've been biting my nails every time I open The Country in the morning because the matter Garzón. Special attention to the absurd column today Rosa Montero. We all know the facts: the Supreme Court after a unanimous decision (unanimous I stress) of the Board of Admissions, has been charged for the crime of prevarication, that is, to have knowingly given serious negligence or inexcusable ignorance, a unjust resolution in relation to their research on missing Franco. Moreover, it is sued by two other issues, one on the Gürtel to use recordings of conversations between lawyers and their clients.

I can understand that there are opinions, not only the character but for defendant on the merits, the crimes of the Franco regime. What I can not understand is that public opinion with such recklessness. And among them highlight the two major unions, the other day did a ceremony at the Complutense while unemployment is galloping at home in this country. It bothers me to see members of the Government and the opposition say so very much of judicial decisions as if they were commentators. I see a terrible act of irresponsibility, we'll see if he is guilty or not, let alone the judiciary of this country, so politicized and blocked because of the same critics.

I find despicable attack the argument of those who submitted the complaint, as a far-right party. Could it be that they are not subject to the law? What harassment is a unanimous decision, both progressive and conservative judges? And why can not think that just Garzón was wrong?

Because that's my opinion and is based on the following argument: Justice and Law are not the same. A judge must respect Law, strictly follow the established process and with maximum guarantees. Garzón initiated a process I knew that I was competent and that no charges alive.

Everything else is intentionally mixing form and substance, what is moral and what is desirable, if Garzon plays well with peers or not, if we have done everything possible to victims of Franco, the definition of Universal Justice ...

The Law is the Law Fair or unfair. For everyone. By

Carloh (aka C.)

Ramoneda

Physics Of Continuous Matter By B. Lautrup

sensationalism

recently reflected a little in the Country the feeling that comes over me lately when I hear news about politics, corruption, benches, insults, right and left. Ennui .

Article Ramoneda.

(Especially the last paragraphs)

Gay Hot Spots Portland

Sports (II)

A newspaper in this country of tambourine called MARK. As Real Madrid has a polite and respectful coach who does not give lurid headlines (computer game do not care) as disliked. So MARK decide that you would like to Madrid controversial best coach that allowed them to sell more pamphlets, you should change for Mourinho, who is a mine of crack and crack. They are already down to work, modeling the critical capacity of the tiny majority of its readers and extending the antimadridismo from each kiosk.

This was the last, but since the Booby Inda BRAND directs the most read newspaper in this blessed country is unparalleled. I leave an interesting audio Ucelay Angel Gonzalez, a veteran sports journalist Punto Radio. It's long but worth it. I wish I had more like him:

Spider Solitaire Unblocker

sensationalism

Today I read, thanks to Blog Itu, this article Andoni Zubizarreta of in which, apart from confirming the good head and hand for writing that is, made me think about the sensationalism of the sports press.

I speak especially of information overdose football there because, although some do not want to see it, the issue is often exhausting, so we get pseudonoticias absurd, without any interest or relevance but are dressed crucial. Above serve to create bitter debates in any media and bar, where everyone seeks his own point of view as radical and aggressive as possible and where the self has disappeared. I think it would be good journalists sometimes Sports give the necessary step back to see it all with some perspective and to realize the absurd and it is committed, that does not benefit either the football or journalism.

The latter is the controversy over whether Christian and Higuain get along or not. As Andoni says, we have all become conscientious analysts of every gesture and draw conclusions where outright can not be removed. Is beginning to matter more so-sporting the sport itself, I believe that information overdose. It speaks more of arbitrators of the parties, speaking of the president of the Federation and alleged favors either team, there are presidents who talk about things that do not pertain to football (see Laporta) players from other sports systematically asked about football, but just won a medal or a title, etc.

then said that this player is dull in the press conference because, wisely, said what was expected. Normal, they do a press conference every day, statements were no longer interesting for decades. In addition, players know that anything they say, however small, is maginificará to be front page of shifts and choose to follow the script and not stepping on any pond. So thank the press of people sincere and straightforward, with the ability to say things without being clear can make them controversial. I'm thinking of the retired goalkeeper Molina, Kiko, and the current Sporting coach Manolo Preciado, pure and simple honesty.

Much of the blame for the overdose and extremism think the media has devoted many more to follow the editorial line to report tax correctly and objectively, as any journalist should do. The information

of "Manolos" no need to talk.